After
reading the first chapter, the question that came to mind was the following: How
can I get my students to ignore that voice in their head that says “I am not a
science person?” I posed this question because I knew that if I gave them a
piece of disciplinary literature to read, if it was from a science journal, it
would most likely be boring and would not pique their interest. I wished that
the first chapter had some concrete insights on how to bring students into the
reading of scientific literature after first removing that negative attitude
toward the discipline.
The second chapter began to answer
my first question. In talking about teaching science literacy, it Buehl brought
up the fact that the disciplinary texts often include intense and foreign
vocabulary, formal tone, and scientific graphics. Much of this is intimidating
to students, and they cannot see that the ability to put complex ideas into
concise sentences, or to interpret graphic material, is a necessary skill for
life. I wonder: is there a way to help students realize that the goal of
achieving science literacy is not necessarily to learn to read journal
articles, but to learn these valuable life skills?
I would say yes, the goal to science literacy is to achieve valuable life skills, but I would also state that you need to expand your horizons through doing things that you don't really want to do but get through it.
ReplyDelete