I learned that disciplinary literacy refocuses
attention from how well one reads to what one reads well. I really resonated
with this point; it reminds me greatly of working from students’ current
knowledge rather than trying to force the creation of entirely new knowledge
without using current knowledge as a stepping stone. Similarly, asking what one
reads well allows instructors to build off of what students already know how to
read well; from that point, small steps can be made to improve! Without this
method, all knowledge that students previously have is considered meaningless,
which is a waste of time for students (why gain knowledge alone if teacher will
just reteach later) and for teachers (re-teaching what students already might
know partly). Embedding disciplinary literacy everyday into lessons is also
paramount to demonstrate the necessity of this skill.
I haven’t previously thought too much about the
importance of reading in science, but it is imperative that I emphasize the significance
of reading in science as a future teacher. For example, scientific articles contain
astounding amounts of information, and since science is perpetually changing
its important for all learners to be able to gather information from scientific
text easily. In the classroom, I’m excited to use scientific text to help
students make connections and see the big picture. At times it can be difficult
to piece different scientific facts together into one giant concept, but text will
be the vehicle for this aha moment.
I really liked the distinction you made between "how well one reads" and "what one reads well." I think this really helps emphasize the fact that there really is no "one size fits all" method to reading across disciplines, and I think that, as teachers, we should acknowledge the differences in literacy in the sciences and use the students' prior skill set to advance science-specific techniques.
ReplyDelete