The Jackson, Dukerich, & Hestenes (2008) article introduced the
concept of modeling as a teaching method in the secondary level science classroom,
specifically physics. In juxtaposition to a standard lecture, modeling is a
more exploratory method of learning, and it involves the students first
discussing the academic topic and asking a question about it, then
collaborating to design an experiment to answer the question, and finally
presenting and justifying their conclusions for the class. This model can then
be applied to other situations in science and can be used to aid in answering
questions on tests and other assessments. This inquiry based approach, the
authors argue, is statistically more successful than lecture alone and can
easily be weaved into the curriculum if teachers are trained. Teachers must be
trained, they say, because otherwise they will teach as they learned
(traditional lecturing).
The Lehrer & Schauble (2010) article defines modeling as a way to
build analogies for the systems of the natural world by relating them to a
specific model system that can be controlled. It also defines the difference
between schools’ current use of modeling as a way to illustrate previously
explained phenomena, and the recommended use of modeling as a way to introduce
and teach said phenomena. They suggest that modeling is not an innate form of
learning, but that teachers must “arrange the conditions for seeing” to help
students discover the model. It is through these models, they say, that
students can develop proficiency in “developing representational competence.”
This article also stresses the importance of training teachers to implement
modeling strategies in an appropriate way.
The Lehrer, Schauble, & Petrosino article differentiates between
modeling and experimentation. They argue that rhetoric, representation, and
modeling must be mastered on some level before experiments can be effective. Otherwise,
students see experiments as a replication of a learned phenomenon, rather than
a representation of it. Teachers can help students learn to see experiments as
representational models by scaffolding their inquiry, and they can also help
students by giving them the prior knowledge necessary to successfully build up
knowledge of new concepts.
These readings all elaborated on what it means to include modeling in
the classroom. Essentially, modeling should be used as a way to teach the
material, rather than a way to represent material that has already been taught
(the latter is the current lecture/experiment method used in many schools). The
students should work collaboratively to find solutions to problems and should
then learn to express what they know about the model. The students should then
be able to apply the model to others earth systems. The role of the teacher is
similar in all three readings. Modeling is not an innate concept, so teachers
must be trained to scaffold the students’ learning by easing them into the
concept of modeling.
Yes I think representational competence is probably the most important aspect of modeling, otherwise students would just do activities without making connections and completely missing the point of the exercise. As educators it is essential to lead students back to the topic at hand so they wouldn't think modeling as just some fun time where they don't copy stuff from the blackboard.
ReplyDeleteAs a teacher and adult, it is sometimes hard to stop and ask oneself - do my students understand the connection between using these materials (in a lab) and what they represent? We often present experiments as completely separate entities and forget that what is obvious to us is not obvious to others. This goes back to the difference between expert and novice thinking - to experts, the broader connections are clear, whereas to novices only details are apparent. We need to remember that students are not born experts!
Delete