tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2257488513052953562.post7468012027658397021..comments2015-11-11T19:32:27.406-08:00Comments on Science Literacies 2015: Week 7 readingsAmandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04288157704159727422noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2257488513052953562.post-85412787521939619732015-10-07T14:16:33.245-07:002015-10-07T14:16:33.245-07:00I think maybe space them out so not all labs requi...I think maybe space them out so not all labs require a write up. The example given in the paper looks like it warrants a report, but some smaller labs when you're just trying to see an on/off phenomenon probably can go without a detailed report.Brian Hanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02132960662541488042noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2257488513052953562.post-16184752152716532582015-10-06T20:11:13.042-07:002015-10-06T20:11:13.042-07:00I understand why a lot of people liked the article...I understand why a lot of people liked the article by Sampson, however, I think my issue with it comes from having repeated this process, over and over and over again in high school and in college. Writing lab reports and working through labs in a processed way may keep everyone on track but I worry about the repetitive nature of this method. Do you think there is a way to prevent the students from seeing this monotony? Students enjoy doing the lab, I also want my students to enjoy every step, while still learning the concepts. I may be naive in wanting this but I hope I can figure out how to implement it in my classroom one day. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16955265291129662203noreply@blogger.com